Home News Global Warming, Carbon Dioxide, And The Solar Minimum

Global Warming, Carbon Dioxide, And The Solar Minimum

30
0

Authored by Renee Parsons Through Off-Guardian. org,

Since Climate Change (CC) continues to be a constant of lifestyle  on Gaia with the growth of photosynthesis 3.2 billion years back and has more complexities than that 1 essay can address; ergo, this guide will investigate co2’s historic contribution to global warming (GW) and research the relationship of Solar Minimum(SM) into Earth’s climate.

Before the UN-initiated Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) formed in 1988, the frequent assumption was that carbon dioxide was thekey greenhouse gas also its increases would be the driving force only responsible for rising weather temperatures. 

At that time, anthropogenic (human caused) GW was declared to be the existential crisis of our time, the science has been settled and we, as a culture, were running out of time.

And in the intervening years, doubt remained approximately GW’s no time impacts that might be suspended from the truth that many of IPCC’sessential climate predictions  of consequence consuming not materializedas predicted.  Even as the staid Economist magazine recently mentioned:

Within the last fifteen years, air temperatures at the Earth’therefore surface although greenhouse gas emissions have continued to soar, have been apartment. ”

Ahead of the IPCC shaped, NOAA’s Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii registered co2 levelsat under 350 ppm (parts per million) together using the explicit warning that if co2 exceeded that amount, Mother Earth had been in Big Trouble — and also now there are no turning back to humanity.  Those alarm bells persist today as co2 levels have risen to 414 ppm as temperatures spanned  in 1998.

From the outset, the IPCC controlled the argument by restricting its own charter

To knowing the scientific basis for risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation. ”

Before any of these science was done, the IPCC’s premise was that man-made activity was responsible and Nature wasn’t an active player in a process in its sphere of attention. 

As an interdisciplinary subject of numerous diversity, the IPCC is not an authority on the areas of science over the CC domain.

While there is not any dispute among scientists that the Sun and its own cyclical output is your real outside drive driving Earth’s energy and climate system as part of a Sun-centered Universe, the IPCC’s exclusion of the Sun from its own thought can simply be considered a deliberate thwarting of a simple fundamental law of  science, a process which assures a completely free question based on reason and evidence.

It is the Sun that all planets of the solar system orbit round, which has the strongest gravitational pull in the solar panel, is the heaviest of all celestial bodies and its own sunspots in regard to Earth’therefore temperatures has been understood since Galileo started drawing sunspots in 1613.

Yet the IPCC which touts a ‘scientific view of climate change’could have us think the Sun is immaterial and irrelevant to the IPCC’s world view and Earth’s climate; yet barely a blip on their radar.

From the GW discussion, co2 is disregarded as a colorless, sterile pollutant which has very little credit as a crucial component for its own contribution to life in the world as photosynthesis does not happen without co2.  A constant presence in Earth’s air because the creation of oxygen, many of living organisms rely on co2 for its own existence. 

Since they release oxygen to the air we 20, as a contributor to agriculture , co2 is absorbed by plants – and four-leggeds rely on for oxygen and sustenance necessities for survival on Earth. 

There are scientists who think that Earth has been in a co2 ‘famine’ while some applaud Earth’s higher co2 levels in the previous few decades as a regreening of the planet.

While An Inconvenient Truth (2006) and An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth About Power (2016) stage handled the climate issue as a thoroughly politicized ‘settled science’ together using former veep Al Gore declaring the play a ‘moral’ difficulty, there’s not any space for any preference that does not rely on a rigorous, skeptical, independent investigation based on evidentiary facts rather than the partisan politics of emotion and abstract notion.

Given the incidence of weather in our daily lives, it would seem basic for engaged citizens and budding paleoclimatologists to understand Earth’s ancient climate background  and atmosphereto be able to get an informed perspective on Earth’s present and potential climate.

As a complex thin-film system, climate is a variable compositionof rhythmic spontaneity with erratic and even chaotic fluctuations making weather predictions near-impossible.  

Climate is an average of weather systems within an established Long-term interval while weather events indicative of a Brief term trend are not exact predictions of CC.   While ice center readings provide information, they don’t show causation of GW but just assess the ratio involving co2 and rising temperatures. It is up to scientists to translate the results.  That ’so in which this narrative takes, like climate and weather patterns, an turn.

It May be called an inconvenient truth that ‘skeptic’ scientists have known for the past twenty years the Vostok ice core samples refute co2’s function as a negative and even question its participation as the major greenhouse gas.  

It is no secret to many climate professionals that water vapor using co2at 3.6 percent.

Situated at the center of the Antarctica ice sheet, also the Vostok Research Center is currently a collaborative endeavor where Russian and French scientists collected undisturbed ice core data in the 1990s to assess the historic presence of carbon dioxide levels. 

Even the Vostoksamples provided the first irrefutable evidence of Earth’s climate history for 420,000 year such as the occurrence of four previous glacial and interglacial periods. 

Those samples finally challenged the earlier assumption  of co2’s predominant function and carbon dioxide was not the climate culprit once believed.   It is fair to bring that IPCC scientists that are associated consider Vostok to function ‘outliers’ in the GW discussion.

The one most significant revelation of this ice center studies has been that GW could not be completely attributed into co2 because carbon dioxide increases occurred aftertemperature increases and an extensive ‘lag’ timing exists between the two.

Logic and apparent thinking necessitates that cause (co2) precedes the impact (raised temps) is in direct contradiction to the assertion that carbon dioxide has been responsible for pushing high global temperatures.   Just s 414 ppm precedes.

Numerouspeer-reviewedstudies verified that co2 lags behind fever increases, initially just as far as 800 decades

That amount was later raised to 8,000 yearso and from 2017 the lag timeinvolving co2 and temperature Was identified as 14,000 decades .    As if a puzzlement from the Quantum world, it’s accepted that CO2 and temperatures have been connected as they grow and fall together, however are divided by a lag period of thousands of years.

What is obscure from public awareness in the GW shuffle is that geologic documents have identified CC as a naturally occurring cyclewith long term phases of 100,000 year periods that are disrupted by brief, heating interglacial intervals  lasting 15,000-20,000 years.

Those interglacial periods function as a temperate respite from what is the world’s natural normal Ice Age environment.  In these glacial and interglacial periods are cyclical subsets of global cooling and warming as today’s interglacial warm period started by the end of the Pleistocene Ice Age about 12,000 Decades ago.    Since climate is not a constant, check these current cases of Earth’s climate subsets:

200 BC — 600 AD: Roman warming cycle

440 AD — 950 AD: Dark Ages cycle

950 AD — 1300 AD: Medieval warming cycle

1300 AD — 1850 AD: Renaissance Little Ice Age

1850 — Present: Modern warming cycle

In addition, climate records show that summit co2 temperatures from the past are relative to today’s co2 degree with no inclusion of a fuelcontribution.   For instance, just as today’s measurement at 414 ppm contains a ‘base’ co2 amount of roughly 300 ppm as recorded in the 19th century, any co2 accumulation over 300 ppm are considered anthropogenic (artificial ) and be portrayed as “historic” & &; lsquo;dangerously large ’ and yet remain statistically insignificant in contrast to historic co2 standards.

During the past 600 million years, just the Carboniferous time and today’s Holocene Epoch each seen co2 levels at less than 400 ppm.

During the Early Carboniferous Period, co2 had been at 1500 ppm with average temperatures comparable to 20 C; 68 F before diving to 350 ppm throughout the Mid Carboniferous interval with a reduced temperature of 12 C;54F. To put it differently, current contributions to co2 are somewhat less than what has been determined to be important.

In contrast to the IPCC’s mentioned goal, NASA recognizes “All weather on Earth, from the surface of the planet in space, starts with the Sun” which weather experienced in Earth’s surface is “affected by the small changes that the Sun undergoes through its solar cycle. ”

Even a Solar Minimum(SM) is a periodic 11 year solar cycle normally manifesting a weak magnetic field with increased radiation and cosmic rays while exhibiting decreased sunspot activity which, in turn, decreases planetary temperatures.

Today’s solar cycle is known as the Grand Minimum that based on NOAA, forecasts reductions from the normal 140 — 220 sunspots per solar cycle into 95 — 130 sunspots.

Since the Sun is entering “among the strangest Solar Minima of the Space Age,” a NASA scientist called a SM that could ”place a Space Age album for cold” but has recently clarified his statement as it applies just to the Thermosphere.

Back in October 2018, NOAA called “Winter Outlook favors Warmer Temperaturefor much of the US,” as above-normal precipitation and document freezing temperatures were advocated throughout the country.

As of the writing, with the Sun noticeably extreme, Earth has undergone 22 successive dayswith no sunspots to get a 2019 total of 95 spotless times at 59%. 

In 2018, 221 times were spotless at 61%.  Spaceweather.com monitors sunspot (in)activity.

With the typical IPCC and Non-IPCCsplit, the SM is expected to be at its lowest by 2020 using a summit between 2023 and 2026 as it exhibits counterintuitive erratic weather anomalies including cooler temps due to enhanced cloud cover, higher temps as a result of solar sunspot-free brilliance, potential electrical events,  heavy rain and flood and drought, a shorter growing period, impacts on agriculture and food production systems or it may all be a stroll in the park with top earners in January.

While there is obviously a significant climate change happening even as the Use of activity as responsible entities remains problematic, the elimination of co2 and its own methane sidekick would be exceedingly advantageous for a healthy planet.   It is time to permit scientists to be scientists with no agendas or hindrance because the Sun and Mother Earth remain within their orbit as they have for eons of millennia.

Since Earth’s evolutionary climate cycles observe that the Universal regulation of the organic world, that the Zero Point Field, that generates an inexhaustible source of ‘free’ energy which Nikola Tesla spoke of, is that the means by which inter leading vehicles travel through time/space.  The struggle for Earthlings is to exploit and extract the ZPF proclaiming a new planetary age of innovation with no rapacious sector, no pollution, no shortages, no gasoline guzzlers and no war.

Buy Tickets for every event – Sports, Concerts, Festivals and more buy tickets