Until now, the public was only conscious of the extraordinary ability of Tesla cars to combust, which is at least when they aren’t currently smashing into random items while. It now seems that Tesla’s solar panels (a few may be unaware that several decades back, Elon Musk attempted to pivot Tesla to a solar energy company as well as that’s where a couple billion in government subsidies were available ) are just as combustible.
On Tuesday, Walmart sued Tesla, after its solar panels beneath seven of their retailer’s stores supposedly grabbed fire, alleging breach of contract, gross negligence and failure to live up to industry norms. Walmart is requesting Tesla to get rid of solar panels in over 240 Walmart places where they’ve been set up, and to cover damages related to each of the fires Walmart says that Tesla caused.
Walmart said it’d leased or licensed roof space at the top of over 240 stores to Tesla’s electricity operations unit, formerly called SolarCity (which was basically a bailout by Elon Musk for Elon Musk who was also the largest SolarCity shareholder), to its installation and operation of solar panels. But at November, fires had broken out in no less than seven of the stores, forcing the disconnection of all the solar panel systems to the safety of the public.
The breach-of-contract suit by Walmart, which was filed in the country of New York, explained that: “As of November 2018, no fewer than seven Walmart stores had undergone fires due to Tesla’s solar systems-including the four fires described above and others that had happened before. ” The fires led to damaged property evacuations and inventory.
Walmart’s Physicians also discovered that Tesla “had participated in widespread, systemic negligence and had failed to abide by prudent business practices in installing, managing and maintaining its solar systems.’
Walmart also claimed that”Tesla regularly deployed people to inspect the solar systems who lacked basic solar training and knowledge” and also alleged that Tesla failed to ground its solar and electrical systems properly, and that Tesla-installed solar panels on-site at Walmart stores contained a high number of defects that were visible to the naked eye, including loose and hanging wires at several locations, and which Tesla should have found and repaired before they led to fires.
It gets better: according to the suit, Tesla’s own inspection reports revealed “improper wire management, including abraded and hanging wires,” as well as “poor grounding” and “solar panel modules that were broken or contained dangerous hotspots. ”
“To state the obvious, correctly designed, installed, inspected and maintained solar technologies don’t spontaneously combust, and the occurrence of multiple fires involving Tesla’s solar technologies is but one particular sign of negligence by Tesla,” Walmart said in the suit. “To this day, Tesla hasn’t supplied Walmart with the complete set of final ‘root trigger ’ analyses required to identify the precise flaws in its systems that caused each of the fires explained above.”
Walmart said the first fire broke out at a store in Beavercreek, Ohio, a suburb of Dayton, in March 2018, and two more fires occurred at stores in California and Maryland in May of that year. While Tesla disconnected the panels at Walmart’s request that same month, it wasn’t enough to stop fires from occurring, and another blaze broke out in November at a store in Yuba City, California.
Ironically, the lawsuit comes at a time when Tesla has been trying to salvage its collapsing solar business; on Sunday, Elon Musk announced in a string of tweets which reeked of desperation that customers in some states can now rent Tesla’s residential, solar rooftop systems without a contract. The offer is available in six states, and will cost customers at least $50 a month (or $65 a month in California). And although Musk touted the ease of cancelling a rented roof at anytime, CNBC noted that the fine print on Tesla’s website mentions a $1,500 fee to take out the solar panels and restore the customer’s roof.
There is a reason why Tesla is basically giving the spontaneously combustible solar panels away: In the second quarter, Tesla installed a mere 29 megawatts of solar, a record low for the company in a single quarter. In its heyday, Tesla’s solar division (formerly SolarCity) installed over 200 megawatts in a single quarter.
But wait there is more.
As if allegations of shoddy quality control, dismal workmanship and overall blatant lack of professionalism weren’t enough, Walmart also”went there” and in the”explosive”, pun not intended 114-page lawsuit, piled onto a long-running controversy according to which Tesla bailed out a failing SolarCity in 2016 when it purchased the company for $2.6 billion (Elon Musk was also the biggest shareholder of SolarCity at the time, while Tesla’s Elon Musk bought out SolarCity in a gross conflict of interest), with WalMart highlighting the familial ties between Tesla and SolarCity as the underpinnings of a flawed merger that allegedly produced shoddy craftsmanship and led to fires at seven Walmart stores.
“On information and belief, even when Tesla purchased SolarCity to bond out the flailing company (whose executives comprised 2 of Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s cousins), Tesla failed to correct SolarCity’s disorderly installation practices or to adopt adequate maintenance protocols, which could have been particularly critical in light of their improper installation practices,” Walmart claimed in a suit that’s sure to draw regulators attention to the 2016 agreement which should never have been permitted. As shown in the diagram above, SolarCity co-founders Lyndon Rive and Peter Rive are Musk’s cousins, although Musk was the largest shareholder of the two companies.
So already facing a slumping stock price in dozens of lawsuits and investigations, store closings, delayed mortgage payments and the death of important executives, even CNBC notes that the Walmart suit lands in a particularly difficult time for Tesla and Musk. In regards to SolarCity, Musk was supposed to be deposed at a complaint.
The name”SolarCity” shows up 46 occasions in the litigation, which means that the firm had a failed business model, originating from a objective to accelerate revenue growth in any way costs.
“Walmart’s encounter bears out Tesla, Inc.’s and Tesla’s inability to turn about and bail out the solar panel operations acquired from SolarCity,” the suit says.
* * *
Walmart is asking a judge to announce Tesla in breach of contract, so order the company to remove the solar panels out of all of its stores and award damages equal to its costs and consulting fees in connection with the fires.
Tesla shares fell as much as 1.7percent to $222.70 as of 6:45 pm in later hours trading. The inventory is down 32 percent this season.
The Situation is Walmart Inc. v. Tesla Energy Operations, New York State Supreme Court, New York County; Index No. 654765/2019.
The litigation is under
Buy Tickets for every event – Sports, Concerts, Festivals and more buy tickets