Home News Yes, climate change can be beaten by 2050. Here’s how.

Yes, climate change can be beaten by 2050. Here’s how.


This article is part of a unique climate change issue ahead of the federal election. This collection of stories offers a comprehensive look at where Canada presently stands, what may be done to address the problem and what the impacts might be if this country continues with half measures. Learn more about why we’re doing this.

The sun rises in Calgary at 2050. A wind-farm employee rolls from bed, packs himself a tofurkey sandwich on rye, checks his condo construction ’s underfloor heating system and hops the electric tram to work.

Welcome into the post-carbon world. We’t dodged the bullet. The global market has shrunk fossil fuels. Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the air have stopped rising. Temperatures are secure. We’ve started harnessing the energy of the sun, the wind, the water as well as the stray heat lurking in the underground or air.

What exactly does it look like? What exactly does it feel like? Maybe most importantly–is this only science fiction, or a potential reality? “Is it possible to turn things around by 2050? The answer is absolutely yes,” says Kai Chan, a professor at the Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability at the University of British Columbia.

There are plenty of scientists monitoring what the world will look like when we fail to rein in the carbon monster. But others, such as Chan, are also monitoring what victory might look like. They aren’t pie-in-the-sky dreamers. They are putting together street maps on how best to safely access into the planet envisioned in the 2015 Paris Agreement, in which temperatures hold at 1.5 degrees Celsius higher than before we started burning fossil fuels.

READ MORE: Yes, we ought to be fearful: What major Canadian climate thinkers say about the crisis

“Three years is enough to do a lot of important things. Within the upcoming few years–when we get started on these they will pay dividends in the forthcoming years,” says Chan, the lead author of the chapter in attaining a sustainable future at a new UN report that predicted the potential extinction of a million species.

Accomplishing a favorable result will meaning shifting the priorities of consumers, business and administration, and rearranging how economic incentives work. To start with, as stated by the International Monetary Fund, it is going to require rejigging a few of those US$5 billion invested by governments to prop up the fossil fuel market. There’ll undeniably be upfront expenses, but those aren’t as large as analysts calculated only a couple of years ago. And long-term profits could flow from new technology.

Making these changes won’t mean years of becoming poor, hungry and cold until things get comfy again. These scientists don’t insist we have to construct off-the-grid cottages in the forests or overhaul how society provides food, energy and jobs. Rather, these scientists say that if we begin at this time , we stand a good chance of transforming society without huge disruption. “Rather than talking about what we may need to give it up ’s an emphasis on which we& & rsquo;ll actually profit,” says Neil Jennings, venture development manager at the Grantham Institute–Climate Change and the Environment at Imperial College London, in England.

No question, it is going to need a massive switch in societyand rsquo;s methods of electricity usage. But quietly, this ’s already happening with electricity generation as solar panels and offshore wind power plummet in price. Iceland and Paraguay have eliminated the carbon out of their grids, as shown by some other energy outlook report from Bloomberg (Paraguay thanks to hydro electricity; Iceland together with hydro and geothermal along with a dash of wine). Europe is on course to become 90 per cent carbon-free from 2040. And Ottawa states that Canada is already at 81 per cent, thanks to hydro, nuclear, wind and solar.

Decarbonizing the whole market is within grasp.

“If we have five years of really sustained efforts, making sure we reorient our businesses and our authorities toward sustainability, then from there on, this transition will probably look quite seamless. Because it’ll only be this gradual reshaping of options,” Chan says, adding: “All those things look very natural once the system is shifting around you. ”

However , it’therefore the day-to-day details that are tough to imagine. How would I get to work? How will I warm my chilly Canadian residence and feed my loved ones? What kinds of jobs will our no-carbon market service?

OUR EDITORIAL: Enough using the climate shift half-measures. Canada has real solutions to think about.

To get David R. Boyd, the metamorphosis in transport is going to be quantified in bird song. Nowadays, electric vehicles are routine. In a carbon-free 2050 globe, they’ll be ubiquitous, says Boyd, a UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and environment and also a professor of law, policy and sustainability at UBC.

“You& & rsquo;ll be living in a town that is cleaner and quieter, in which you could actually hear the birds singing about the way to operate,” he says. The noisy internal combustion engine will soon probably be all but obsolete. Cities will be built for biking and walking, featuring ample electrified general transit. This isn’t a utopian vision,” he says. “Everything I’t stated is grounded in tendencies that are occurring today. ”

It matters, because transport internationally constitutes nearly a quarter of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions, according to the latest evaluation report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In Canada, carbon emissions from transport are steadily up because we buy more SUVs and do this much truck-delivered online shopping, government figures reveal. And at the moment, electric vehicles make up less than two per cent of fresh revenue in Canada.

The game-changer is going to be the collapse in the cost of lithium-ion batteries, that run electric vehicles, says Ajay Gambhir, a senior research fellow at the Grantham Institute at London who assesses the global carbon image. The price of a single lithium-ion battery pack stood at US$176 at 2018. That’s a fall of 85 per cent from 2010, according to the Bloomberg report. Sales of passenger vehicles that rely upon the internal combustion engine have already peaked around the world, the report included.

Other nations are showing us just how quickly the electrification of transit vehicles may capture on. China, for instance, already has over 400,000 electric city buses on the streets, a figure that grew by roughly a third in the last year alone,” says the report. Meanwhile, Canada has pledged $23.5 billion for public transit infrastructure over the next ten years in a series of bilateral agreements with states and territories.

What about travel by train, airplane and ship? Trains can be changed from gas to electrical, Gambhir says. But aviation and shipping will need more futuristic plans for to carbon dioxide. He has expects that tubal kerosene fuel for boats and short-range electric planes, now being analyzed, might be common at 2050. Longer-haul flights may need to rely on electrically generated hydrogen for a gas. 

Gambhir isn’t ruling out hyperloops, the mass-transit darling of all Tesla co-founder Elon Musk, now in development. Hyperloops operate by forcing pods containing goods and maybe people at high speed through a vacuum tube captured between the drive of the electromagnetic field along with the pull of the Earth’s gravity. If hyperloops can remove the floor, so to speak, they could dramatically reduce the need for carbon-heavy domestic aviation, Gambhir says.

A passive home under construction, ready for the thick insulating material that raises energy efficiency (Jure Gasparic/Alamy)

A Canadian winter with no furnace? You bet, says Guido Wimmers, an architectural engineer who’s chair of the master of engineering, integrated wood design software at the University of Northern British Columbia in Prince George. He’s a professional in the ultra-energy-efficient construction called the “passive home. ”

“There are thousands and thousands of them assembled across the planet. You can do it today. There’s no necessity to wait until 2050,” he says.

A passive home doesn’t use a system to create heat, such as a traditional oil or gas furnace, or even electric room heaters. On the contrary, it employs a heat-recovery exchange ventilator to draw waste energy out of your body, the sun as well as appliances from the atmosphere. Passive-heat buildings operate because they’re airtight and thickly insulated.

It’therefore the identical principle as dressing to the outside during cold weather: a hot coating covered by some thing to lower the wind, and a port in case you become overheated and begin to sweat. The buildings typically also use solar power and shade–along with triple-glazed windows–to manage temperature and organic daylight in the construction.

Wimmers not just assembles them, he has lived inside them.

“Good buddies once seen me and stated, ‘You know, it seems just like living in a spa,’& & thinsp;& & rdquo; he says. “Even in case it’s without 20 on the outside, you’re feeling really comfortable. There’s no drafts, no cold locations. It only feels good. ” Air quality can also be top-notch because of the ventilator, he adds, and thick walls make it seem cozy.

Wimmers, a founder of the Canadian Passive House Institute, helped construct the very first official “passive” home in Canada. That home started its existence as Austria’s headquarters to the 2010 Winter Olympics at Whistler, B.C.. Following the Games, Austria gave the building to the municipality and it’s now a commercial space called Lost Lake PassivHaus. It requires just a fifth of those gas it would take to cool and heat a typical house in Whistler.

Passive construction construction is catching on in Canada, such as in the industrial and commercial sectors, although it costs roughly 10 per cent over a conventional structure. The University of Victoria’s fresh 782-bed student residence and dining hall, with a complete commercial kitchen and classrooms, which will probably soon be one. Canada’s first passive-house daycare opened in Penticton, B.C., two years back, saving as much as 90 per cent on electricity costs every year.

READ: Extreme weather could eventually make climate change a ballot-box problem

Construction codes are under revision across Canada to maneuver the trend along. In B.C., current changes to voluntary building energy codes aim for new homes to create as much clean energy as they have by 2032, Wimmers says. Ottawa has similar goals for the country for 2030. Since these kinds of heating systems become more prevalent, they become expensive. Because you don’t must pay for a furnace or energy, they pay for themselves .

Another low-carbon technology for heating buildings is the heat pump. Like the mechanism on your refrigerator, heat pumps tap the compression/expansion cycle of gases for cool or heat homes. Often called “refrigerators in reverse,” they extract heat from air, water or the floor and put it to use within buildings, relying upon only a small bit of electricity to power the pump, says that the Grantham Institute’s Gambhir.

The reality for Canadians is that they may not do the job fully in very cold climates, he says, and could take a boost from a micro gas boiler. But heat-pump engineering is getting more popular. France installed roughly a quarter of a million of them in homes this past year, Gambhir says. Theyrsquo;re taking hold at the U.K., also.

“This really can be a totally commercialized and accessible tech,” Gambhir says. “That’s no particularly innovative technology, it’s merely something that we ought to be seeing a lot more of in people’s homes. ”

By 2050, older homes will be using a whole lot less energy, also. Jennings, as well as their Grantham Institute, sees a future in which homes are more prone to make them more energy-efficient. Meaning they’ll be warmer and drier as well, and poorer citizens will no longer have to choose between heating and eating.

Like transport, changing the construction stock is another crucial area of the strategy to decarbonize the market. In actuality, the IPCC states buildings “signify a critical piece of a low-carbon prospective. ” And also a movement to mass retrofits has advantages that go much beyond carbon. It may create tasks –using retraining–for all those displaced from carbon-intense vocations, an important part of creating sure the carbon-free future market doesn’t depart workers behind.

And it may cut down on health expenses. In the U.K., a few general practitioners have experimented together “boilers on prescription drugs. ” They compose a health-care-covered prescription for destitute patients–not only for new boilers, but also greater windows and house insulation. It’s a means of reducing the prices of visits to emergency rooms and doctors. It’so functioning. A study on the project discovered that for every British pound spent creating homes warmer, the National Health Service saved 42 pence as people cut down on physician visits for respiratory problems, strokes and heart attacks.

Another pilot project that began in Islington–now rolled out over London–has health officials speaking homeowners into a group that brainstorms together for grants for new boomers, find out energy-saving tactics and figure out how to decrease fuel expenses.

“It’s exactly the type of thing that should be scaled as promptly as possible,” Jennings says, “as you’re dealing with the origin of a health-related problem instead of just dealing with the symptoms and, in this circumstance, sending elderly people back into the very house that made them sick in the first location. ”

READ: How climate change is destroying the Arctic

Will we be the farmers, foresters and drillers of yore, develop a carbon-free 2050? Yes. But, we ’ll do it otherwise, ” says Chan, with the goal of not only cutting carbon from the combination, but also bringing crops and animals back from the edge of extinction.

Many large-scale monoculture farms may give way to those that develop a suite of distinct plants, ” he says. The ones that stay will operate smarter, with fewer pesticides and relying more on natural predators to control pests,” he says.

Fertilizers, that boost emissions of the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide, which will probably soon likely be used a lot more sparingly, says Gambhir. And much more cows and sheep will reside in coated grazing spaces so that the methane they release could be obtained and used.

What else could be around the dinner plate of the future? Maybe more lab-grown beef or fabricated protein, and lots more veggies, says Gambhir, adding: “Food and diet is a huge, huge area of potential wins in terms of greenhouse gas emission reductions. ” Granted, it might mean substantial changes for passionate carnivores.

As for forests, they’ll no more be replanted with enormous tracts of the exact species, the identical era, Chan says. Rather, they’ll contain many species of different ages. It adds up to more bees and birds. The landscape will look and feel much more varied.

“We& & rsquo;re going to see changes,” Chan says, adding: “As a consequence of that, you’re going to see a balancing back of nature. ”

Gambhir states a few prospective industrial jobs will come in enlarging carbon-capture enterprises. They take carbon out of the waste streams of, say, cement-manufacturing crops, liquify it, and then transport it into secure spaces underground. Along with an emerging technology entails sucking carbon directly from the air in huge volumes through chemical scrubbers and compounds, and storing it underground. Another is growing carbon-eating crops for fuel whilst also catching the carbon monoxide when they burn off , a double-win for pulling carbon from the atmosphere.

“We& & rsquo;ll likely need some level of negative emissions technology,” says Gambhir, “but you or I won’t find those because they& & rsquo;ll be carried out in large, centralized areas. ”

The world of 2050 will look, sound, odor and taste a little different once we succeed in turning the switch on carbon. It’ll be a much healthier world, with more walking, more green spaces, more crops and animals, less sickness, far less air pollution, more and likely less meat but far better nourishment.

It’ll feel different, also. Today, some mental health providers in the Europe and North America have banded together to create climate psychiatry alliances, driven by the necessity to help patients cope with powerlessness and regret. By 2050, those alliances may no longer be mandatory.

“By 2050, people will look back at 2020 and state : ‘What are they thinking! ’& & thinsp;& & rdquo; Boyd says.

That’s not to say it’ll be a cakewalk. Kirsten Zickfeld, among two Canadian lead writers on the current IPCC report describing exactly what the physical universe will look like when we limit heating at 1.5 degrees Celsius, says that the carbon dioxide we all ’t put into the air will take hundreds if not thousands of years to go away.

“It’therefore a really slow procedure,” says Zickfeld, a climate physicist at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, B.C. “What this suggests is that the temperature we encounter at the Earth’s surface may actually not come down once we cease emissions. It will stay at that exact point at which we stopped emitting. So temperature will probably likely be elevated for a very long time period. ”

Sea levels will continue to rise. The sea will continue to warm up, lose oxygen and acidify, with awful consequences for marine life. The frozen parts of the planet will last to thaw, such as ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica, permafrost and Arctic sea ice. Life in the far warmer Arctic will soon be profoundly altered.

“The weather doesn’t forget,” she says. “Even when we get to zero emissions, the weather will still remember the time once we put carbon into the air. ”

And there are plenty of ways a transition could fail. Gambhir shudders to think about fresh energy-chomping customer fads that could remove, refining progress made on private energy cutbacks. Say, a must-have virtual atmosphere for the house.

“As a society, we must capitalize on energy-saving creations and temper those creations that would increase the profligacy of our energy usage,” he says.

READ: Are ‘green’ towns a major part of our difficulty with climate change?

The change into a no-carbon future may also change the kinds of jobs available. Some businesses will be big winners. The clear one is the global fossil-fuel business. To satisfy the 1.5-degree target, the sum of energy supplied by fossil fuels might need to begin falling in the 2020s and also be cut in half by 2050. It’s a huge concern in Canada, in which whole communities depend on the fossil-fuel business. But additionally, it will hit on Russia, the Middle East and Central Asian states challenging, Gambhir along with his co-authors calculated at a recent newspaper. Some of those jobs will evaporate overnight, and a few of the workers will have difficulty retraining for additional work.

Overall, the newspaper reckons that a total of six million jobs may evaporate by 2030. On the other hand, 24 million brand fresh ones will appear, when compared with the high-carbon “industry as standard ” market.

Jennings warns that it’so critical to take care of people who stand to lose their jobs in the transition. What exactly does the existence of a petroleum worker in Calgary seem like in 2050? Maybe managing a solar plantation or producing medication scrubbers for carbon capture and storage centers.

Jennings points to oil and gas workers in Britain who have transferred their skills en masse to overseas wind generation. An unhappier instance was that the hemorrhage of production and coal-mining jobs in the U.K. beginning in the 1980s because the service industry roared. Social upheaval was immense. A recent study included the price of unemployment benefits to those workers at greater than $5 billion a year now. And lots of permanently withdrew from the usage.

“When we don’t receive those transitions right, it has really significant consequences to the lives of people in those communities and for society more generally,” Jennings says.

It’ll mean pulling together, says Reneltta Arluk, director of Indigenous arts at the Banff Centre for Arts and Creativity in Alberta and also a playwright whose work frequently touches about the danger of climate catastrophe.

“I don’t believe we ever need to go back into the past,” she says. “But the gorgeous thing about the future is that we will need to become more relational to survive because the environment will demand that out of us. ”

When she appears into some carbon-free 2050, ” she sees that the reimagining of boundaries, a gathering of this like-minded, possibly the production of safe havens where animals can re-emerge. Maybe even the settlement of grief.

“From there, that’so where we get to grow and learn and create and make room for newness,” she says.

This report appears in print at the August 2019 subject of Maclean’s magazine with the headline, “Wait! There’s good news. ” Subscribe to the monthly print magazine here.

The post Yes, climate change could be defeated by 2050. Here’s how. Appeared first on Macleans.ca.

Buy Tickets for every event – Sports, Concerts, Festivals and more buy tickets