Tesla Slips Again in Residential Solar Rankings, Dropping to Third in Q1 2019



Tesla, the lux energy firm that also sells cars, sank to next position among residential solar providers for installations in the first quarter of 2019. 

The latest ranking, from Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables, shows Vivint Solar knocking Tesla out of second location. Sunrun’s direct solar business pulled forward of Tesla in the second half of 2018. 

That's not going to mention that Vivint gained market share at Tesla's cost. Vivint’s percent of this market actually rallied, from a high of 11.6 percent in 2014 to 7.3 percent so far in 2019. Those figures emphasize the size of Tesla’s decrease. Retailing for 32.6 percent of this market in 2014 since SolarCity, Tesla now lays claim to just 6.3 percent of this market this season. 

In general, WoodMac forecasts flat 3 percent increase for its residential solar market in 2019. Tesla continues to be a depressing element. 

“The development perspective for 2019 — such as 2018 and 2017 — has been hampered by Tesla’s conclusions to cut back channels,” said Austin Perea, ” a solar analyst at WoodMac.

Several changes in sales strategy have left economists skeptical about Tesla’s business, which it acquired when it bought SolarCity for $2.6 billion in 2016. The company has wound down a venture to sell solar in Home Depot stores and will be moving to close many of its own stores, in which it offered solar alongside vehicles and batteries.

That leaves online earnings as Tesla’s strongest flow of buys. In a current report, Perea noted that the firm may not observe a balancing of organic sales via net and referral earnings until the second half of the year. 

“They have cut out every single type of busy customer purchase,” said Perea. “We actually expect them to continue to view declines relative to 2018 via 2019. ”

The drop in residential setups comes amid broader turmoil in Tesla’s enterprise that is solar. Reuters recently reported that solar cells created by Panasonic at Tesla’s Buffalo, New York factory are now being shipped to the Philippines, instead of used in Tesla’s trademark solar roof. Back in April, Greentech Media released a report digging to issues about Tesla’s responsibilities at that plant and also its own capacity to scale the solar roof. 

Tesla instead pointed to previous statements, and declined to comment on the latest installation numbers.

“For energy storage and solar, traditional sales methods require systems. This causes a cumbersome buying experience and restricts market potential,” the firm explained in its Q1 correspondence to shareholders. “As we have done for the automobile industry, the key to mass adoption would be to standardize the product offering, simplify the consumer buying experience, and focus on the markets with the economics. This causes cost efficiencies. ”

It s that at exactly the time Tesla’s market share has faltered, its customer acquisition costs have diminished. In the second half of 2018, the company was spending $0.40 per watt to acquire customers. From the end of 2019, WoodMac analysts said Tesla may be spending ldquo;close to a quarter” a watt.  

According to the energy research firm, customer purchase prices stay the costliest part of residential solar systems, accounting for 21% of overall costs in 2018. Vivint and Sunrun have customer acquisition costs at $0.94 a watt and $0.90 a watt, respectively.

“With current saturation levels, customer acquisition costs aren’t likely to return,” said Perea. “Tesla knows where the price stack is right today and that they ’re in a position to rely on additional business units … They& & rsquo;re diversified in a way that other versions aren’t.” 

The recent leaders in real estate , Vivint and Sunrun, must rely on ballooning installment numbers to continue growing. Due to its luxury car brand and its own storage industry, Tesla doesn’t. 

The stepdown of this Investment Tax Credit, that drops to zero to customer-owned approaches in 2022, means that many systems that are residential will rise up in price, because price declines will not match the loss of this incentive.

“I’m not saying that Tesla is doing the right thing , however I think they understand that rsquo, customer acquisition costs aren &;t going anywhere,” said Perea. “It’thus getting a product at a cheaper price point than some of its competitors. That’s because theyrsquo;ve now been decreasing their customer acquisitions costs. ”

According to analysts, the company is not likely to beat against competitions using installation volume’s metric that the solar industry has generally utilised to measure achievement.

In case Tesla will bounce back in its existing challenges and keep its own below-average costs to sign up new customers, it will have outwitted business expectations and shown that acquisition costs don’t must be exorbitant — so long as you are in possession of a shiny new name.  

Buy Tickets for every event – Sports, Concerts, Festivals and more buy tickets

Discover more from Teslas Only

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading